[
Action remakes fail for a brutally simple reason: people think action is the easiest genre to copy. They think the thing to preserve is the weapon, the catchphrase, the coat, the car, the fights, the one cool shot everybody remembers. And in doing so, they end up missing the plot, the sequences, the suspense coded in the story, and character arcs.
Action movies that are properly loved are almost never beloved for the hardware alone. They are beloved because the action is carrying an attitude, a philosophy, a star persona, a rhythm of violence, a code of masculinity, a private sadness, a sleazy pulse, some very specific idea of cool that belonged to that movie and that movie only. Now that is exactly why bad action remakes, especially the 10 in this list, feel so dead.
10
‘Death Wish’ (2018)
The original Death Wish is not great because vigilante revenge is automatically exciting but because it is ugly, uneasy, and tied to urban panic, masculine helplessness, and the moral corrosion of a man deciding violence is the only remaining language that gets results. Paul Kersey (Charles Bronson)’s whole screen presence helps too.
The remake treats the premise like a cleaner, more streamlined revenge-delivery system. Paul Kersey (Bruce Willis) becoming a killer again should feel like a rupture in the soul. Instead it often feels like the movie is efficiently guiding him toward his genre-assigned upgrade. That is the writing problem. It skips too much moral sickness in its rush to empowerment. Willis, late-period and half-disengaged, does not help. The violence is there, the outrage is there, the family attack is there, though the queasy rot that made the original worth arguing about is mostly gone. It is revenge with the discomfort removed, which is exactly what this story should never be.
9
‘The Taking of Pelham 123’ (2009)
The original The Taking of Pelham 123 is a great urban-tension machine because it understands that procedure can be thrilling when everybody in the room has a sharply defined place in the mechanism. The hijacking is nasty, specific, and gloriously grounded in city systems, labor friction, personalities, and the low-key weirdness of New York bureaucracy under pressure. It moves like a machine running too hot.
Tony Scott’s remake turns that same material into louder, more agitated star combat. That sounds fun in theory. Walter Garber (Denzel Washington) and Ryder (John Travolta) facing off should give you a lot to work with. But the movie keeps inflating everything emotionally and stylistically until the underlying precision gets lost. Walter Garber is pushed harder toward guilt-ridden protagonist drama, and Ryder becomes more demonstrative, more actorly, less unnervingly contained. The original hijacking felt like civic pressure turning airtight. This one often feels like a very expensive argument trying to convince you it is tense.
8
‘Get Carter’ (2000)
The original Get Carter is cold in a way remakes almost never dare to be. Jack Carter (Michael Caine) is a dangerous man returning home with professional ruthlessness already wired into him, and the film keeps peeling back the rot around his brother’s death until revenge starts feeling less like catharsis than a walk deeper into filth. The movie is grimy, unsentimental, and absolutely sure that violence does not make anybody cleaner.
The remake takes all of that and starts softening and broadening it into generic star-vehicle revenge. Jack Carter (Sylvester Stallone) becomes more mournful, more approachable, more conventionally bruised. That might sound like emotional depth, but it weakens the story’s spine. Get Carter should circle a man who belongs to moral squalor moving through a world equally dirty. Here it makes him much more ordinary, a familiar avenger plot with some noir-ish residue clinging to it. Stallone is not miscast on charisma terms, but the script keeps trying to give him a nobility the material should resist.
7
‘The Killer’ (2024)
This one is painful because John Woo’s original The Killer is not just an action film. It is an action melodrama with blood in its eyes. It is doves, guilt, Catholic ache, impossible friendship, gunplay as emotional confession, men dying for codes they can barely still articulate. You cannot remake The Killer by keeping the assignment, assassin, witness, betrayal, and shootouts, and expecting that to be enough. The whole point was the tragic romanticism flooding the violence.
The remake has craft and surface competence, sure. It moves. It shoots cleanly enough. It respects the outline. But the writing never finds that insane devotional intensity Woo brought to his own material. Zee (Nathalie Emmanuel) is given the structural role, but the movie around her feels much more procedural than operatic. The emotional excess is thinned out. The doomed tenderness is thinned out. The sense that bullets are carrying moral grief is gone. You are left with a decent-looking professional-action product adapted from a film that was never merely a product in the first place.
6
‘Conan the Barbarian’ (2011)
A Conan movie should feel like it was dragged out of a fire-lit myth told by somebody half-drunk and still bleeding from the last battle. That is the level of elemental force the material needs. The 1982 film gets there not by overexplaining its world but by trusting silence, ritual, steel, score, landscape, and the almost sculptural presence of Conan (Arnold Schwarzenegger) and his value comes from being forged in substance. The remake’s Conan (Jason Momoa) lacks that part.
You see, Momoa actually had some of the raw material. He can move, sneer, dominate the frame. The problem is the writing keeps throwing him into a busier, more generic revenge-fantasy shape. Momoa’s Conan should’ve felt like a barbaric force moving through an ancient world of pain, lust, gods, and steel. Instead he often feels like a modern action hero dropped into sword-and-sorcery production design. The movie keeps mistaking activity for myth. It gives you curses, villains, chases, magical objects, severed heads, all the ingredients, and almost none of the old pagan grandeur that makes this material live.
5
‘Road House’ (2024)
The original Road House is gloriously stupid, yes, but it is stupid with total conviction. Dalton (Patrick Swayze) is a bouncer turned frontier philosopher somehow, the town is corrupt in a comic-book way, the violence is barroom ballet filtered through late-’80s macho mysticism, and Patrick Swayze’s weirdly serene charisma makes the whole thing hang together. It is not believable for one second, and that is part of the religion of it.
The remake is slicker, self-aware, and much less fun for exactly that reason. Elwood Dalton (Jake Gyllenhaal) is played with that modern smirk of a movie half-embarrassed to be what it is. He has some good moments, and Gyllenhaal can obviously commit physically, but the writing keeps undercutting the primal idiot majesty the premise needs. The violence lands harder in places, though the world around it feels thinner, less mythic, less joyfully overcommitted. And the villain ecosystem never becomes as deliciously corrupt and cartoonish as a Road House movie should. It is smoother than the original and emptier where it counts.
4
‘Red Dawn’ (2012)
The original Red Dawn is many things, including deeply ridiculous propaganda, but it absolutely understands adolescent war fantasy in a way the remake never touches. It is about American teenagers getting thrown into guerrilla resistance mythology overnight, their hometown turned into a battlefield, their bodies and ideas of manhood weaponized by invasion panic. It is absurd, yes, but it has raw energy and genuine generational fear pulsing through it.
The remake feels sanitized by comparison, which is almost impressive given the premise. Jed Eckert (Chris Hemsworth) and the new Wolverines go through the same broad motions, occupation, resistance, hit-and-run retaliation, patriotic survival, but the movie never finds the desperate teenage romanticism of kids becoming soldiers too quickly. Everything is more processed, more post-Bourne, more focus-grouped into generic combat-uplift. Even the invader-change production weirdness hangs over the whole thing like a symptom of a film that already did not know what it believed in. A story like this needs fever but this one had franchise pilot energy instead.
3
‘The Crow’ (2024)
Some movies are simply terrible remake candidates because the original is fused to a specific cultural wound. The Crow is one of them. It is not just a revenge fantasy with goth makeup and a cool coat. It is grief made mythic. Brandon Lee’s death hangs over it, yes, but even inside the film the whole thing feels like romantic mourning soaked in industrial rain, comic-book sorrow, and a city that looks spiritually unrecoverable. Eric Draven (Brandon Lee) works because he feels like love refusing to stay dead quietly.
The remake keeps trying to make the material more explicit, more psychologically unpacked, more modern-dark, and it loses the haunted poetry almost immediately. Eric (Bill Skarsgård) and Shelly (FKA twigs) are given more relationship scaffolding, but the writing never turns that into the same mythic ache. It feels labored instead of fated. And once The Crow stops feeling fated, it is just another revenge property with makeup. The violence is there. The gloom is there. The iconography is there. The wounded romantic soul that made the original beloved is barely breathing.
2
‘Rollerball’ (2002)
The original Rollerball is one of the smartest action-satire films ever made because it understands spectacle as political control. The sport is brutal and seductive by design, a place where individual greatness has to be crushed because corporations want the public addicted to violence without believing in heroes. Jonathan E. (James Caan) is compelling because his mere persistence starts threatening a system built on depersonalization. That is elegant writing. The action and the theme are the same machine.
The remake takes that perfect setup and acts like the sport itself is enough. That is an almost unforgivable misread. Jonathan Cross (Chris Klein) has no mythic weight, no anti-system charge, no sense of accidentally becoming larger than the entertainment machine wants him to be. The film keeps reaching for flashy nihilism, night-vision nonsense, MTV-era editing, and pseudo-extreme-sports attitude while completely fumbling the original’s social intelligence. Rollerball should feel like violence being marketed until the crowd forgets what human value looks like. The remake mostly feels like a bad music video with shoulder pads.
1
‘Point Break’ (2015)
This one had to be number one. It had to. Because Point Break is one of the most spiritually specific action films ever made, and the remake seems to have understood absolutely none of its pulse. Kathryn Bigelow’s original is not just “FBI guy infiltrates adrenaline criminals.” It is a movie about seduction, male identity, spiritual emptiness, the pull of risk as pseudo-religion, and the terrifying possibility that the man you are chasing is also the man showing you the most alive version of yourself.
The remake sees the extreme-sports surface and runs straight off a cliff with it. Johnny Utah (Luke Bracey) is flattened into a much duller action-template protagonist, and Bodhi (Édgar Ramírez), who should feel like a charismatic prophet of freedom and self-destruction, becomes a vague global-thrill-seeker guru without the original’s erotic-dangerous magnetism. The robberies become eco-stunt mission statements. The intimacy vanishes. The madness vanishes. The feeling that risk itself has become a theology vanishes. Point Break without obsession is nothing. This remake proves it.
https://static0.colliderimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/john-travolta-in-the-taking-of-pelham-123-2009-still.jpg?w=1600&h=900&fit=crop
https://collider.com/worst-remakes-of-beloved-action-movies/
Safwan Azeem
Almontather Rassoul
