An entry-level upgrade with flagship 40MP sensor, IBIS, and a new Film Simulation dial
Pros
- Film simulation dial
- Up to 7-stops of IBIS
- Beautiful handling
- Up to 6K/30p video
Cons
- Could use a slightly larger grip
- No weather sealing
- Expensive
Sitting below the X-T50 with a non-stabilized 26MP sensor, but otherwise a strikingly similar user experience
Pros
- Sharp stills and video
- Tidy retro design
- Can be stowed in jacket pocket
Cons
- Modest upgrade of the X-T30 II
- A bit pricey
- Loss of shooting mode dial
The X-T50 is only slightly larger than the X-T30 III, but has in-body image stabilization, once only found in Fujifilm’s much larger cameras. It has a higher-resolution sensor too, but costs significantly more in return.
We’ll dig into the details further in this article. But what are your other X-T30 III alternatives?
The last-generation X-T30 II, which could be discontinued soon, is similarly capable for stills, but doesn’t offer 4K / 60p or 6.2K video. Then there’s the X-M5 from late 2024, which is technically very similar to the X-T30 III, but is sure to put off many more traditional photographers with its lack of viewfinder, and a design that prioritizes trim dimensions over grip and comfort.
But back to the main event, let’s compare the X-T30 III and X-T50, focusing on the main differences.
1. Kit lenses
- X-T30 III – available with the XC 13-33mm f3.5-6.3 OIS
- X-T50 – two kit options; XC 15-45mm f3.5-5.6 OIS PZ or XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8
Kit lenses are rarely all that exciting. With more affordable cameras like the X-T30 III they are the lenses you may one day hope to move on from. But this time it’s a little different.
Fujifilm used the X-T30 III’s launch to announce a brand new model in its keenly-priced XC lens series, the XC 13-44mm f/3.5-6.3 with OIS. It’s equivalent to a 20-50mm lens in the 35mm full-frame standard.
It goes significantly wider than the long-standing XC 15-45mm Power Zoom lens that ships with the more affordable X-T50 bundles, while of course not providing quite as much zoom power at the other end.
The new XC 13-33mm is even smaller and lighter too, at 125g and 61.9mm × 37.5mm. Fujifilm’s XC 14-45mm — which has been around since 2018 — weighs 135g and measures 62.6mm x 44.2mm when just chilling out on the camera body.
However, only the X-T50 gets a secondary option from Fujifilm’s XF lens series, the XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8. Don’t mistake this for the long-standing 16-55mm glass, it’s a new-in-2024 lens that is radically smaller and lighter. It weighs just 240g (the old lens is 655g) and is relatively petite at 65mm×71.4mm.
The trade-off is, for an XF lens, that the maximum aperture drop-off at the telephoto end is significant. Like the recently-discontinued, and semi-legendary, XF 18-55mm lens, though, edge of frame sharpness is good.
2. Price
- X-T30 III – $999 / £829 / AU$1,679 (body only), $1,149 / £999 / AU$1,949 with kit lens
- X-T50 – $1,399 / £1,299 / AU$2,599 (body only), $1,999 / £1,399 / AU$2,799 (XC lens bundle), $1,799 / £1,649 / AU$3,149 (XF lens bundle)
The Fujfilm X-T30 II costs up to $400 / £470 less than the X-T50, although the disparity can be lower when buying with a kit lens.
You’ll pay $999 / £829 / AU$1,679 for a Fujifilm X-T30 II, body only. Or $1,399 / £1,299 / AU$2,599 for an X-T50.
The gap drops to £400 with the base kit lens, because the list price of the new XC 13-33mm is a little higher than that of the XC 14-45mm.
The pricing of the new X-T30 III lets its slink under two important barriers. It’s under $1000 body-only in the US, and under £1000 with kit lens in the UK.
However, as seen across the Fujifilm range, US prices have been subject to tariff-related hikes in recent months. The Fujifilm X-T50 nowadays actually costs more than it did at launch stateside in late 2024.
3. Sensor
- X-T30 III – 26.1MP APS-C, X-Trans 4
- X-T50 – 40.2MP APS-C, X-Trans 5
While both of these cameras have APS-C size sensors, the X-T50’s is a much higher resolution chip. It has 40.2 megapixels to its name, compared to the 26.1 megapixels of the X-T30 II. That lower-end series has stuck around this mid-20-megapixel ballpark since 2017’s X-T20.
As such, the X-T50 is going to provide significantly better scope for large prints, and for cropping into images without obvious compromise. This is especially useful if you intend to use some of Fujfilm’s brilliant prime lenses rather than the kit zoom lens.
Fujifilm has also compensated for the high resolution, by giving the X-T50 a larger frame buffer for burst shooting.
One unavoidable knock-on effect of having more pixels crammed into a similar area is smaller photosites, which ends up with lower native light sensitivity. However, being one generation on in sensor tech can hide much of this in practice, and the X-T50 has one special feature to more than make up for it…
4. In-body image stabilization
- XT30 III — No IBIS
- X-T50 – IBIS, 5-axis (7 stops)
The X-T50 is one of Fujifilm’s smallest, lightest cameras in this category with an in-body image stabilization system — just pipped by the X-E5, which is even smaller thanks to its rangefinder-style design.
This means you don’t need to use an optical image stabilized (OIS) lens to be able to use slightly longer exposures while shooting handheld, without clear risk of handshake blur. Fujifilm says it’s worth up to seven stops of effectiveness, mirroring the IBIS system of the much larger X-T5, which also weighs 100g more.
There is no IBIS system in the X-T30 II. And while the kit lens has its own OIS to help out, plenty of Fujifilm’s best lenses do not have OIS. It’s going to limit the kinds of photography you can do at night, and other lower light environments.
Back in this wider camera series’s earlier days, you had to make do with the X-H1 if you wanted IBIS. Brilliant as that camera was (and still is), it’s huge compared to the X-T50 at 139.8 mm × 97.3 mm × 85.5 mm.
5. Design differences
- X-T30 III – 118.4mm x 82.8mm x 46.8mm, 378g, 1.62M rear, 315 normal mode batt shots
- X-T50 – 124 x 84 x 49 mm, 438g, 1.84M rear. 305 normal mode batt shots
While impressively petite for an IBIS camera, the X-T50 is slightly larger than the X-T30 II. It measures 124 x 84 x 49 mm, compared to 118.4mm x 82.8mm x 46.8mm for the X-T30 III. A smattering of millimetres extra in each dimension.
Fujifilm has tried to mask this, though, with a new extra-rounded shape for the sides of the camera. The same technique is used in some phones, where rounded glass on front and/or back panels can trick your hands into believing a phone is slimmer than it is.
The X-T50 also has a slightly higher-resolution rear display, of 1.84 million dots to 1.62 million dots. It’s not a major upgrade, mind. Fujifilm hasn’t messed too much with the basic style either. Both cameras have that classic retro-inspired look, and come with either a black, charcoal or silver top third.
They also share the slightly contentious — among some circles at least — film simulation filter dial up top, instead of a more traditional mode dial. A backwards design step for those that change shooting settings more often than color profiles.
6. What’s the same?
Higher resolution and IBIS are the two major differences between these two cameras. A lot of the other core elements are the same, or similar.
The Fujifilm X-T30 III and X-T50 can both shoot video at up to 6.2K resolution (although at different aspect ratios) or at 4K/60. They have the same processor and comparable auto focusing systems, offering Fujifilm’s latest subject detection skills.
Neither requires an expensive CFexpress card for best results. A higher-speed SDXC will do the job just fine.
Verdict
Is substantially greater resolution and IBIS worth the extra money Fujifilm asks for the X-T50? To many, sure.
Fujifilm has even tried to flatten out the effects of the slightly increased bulk with an altered casing shape. We’re well past the range being separated into two size stratifications, where some features don’t bleed between the two.
The Fujifilm X-T30 III is still the better option for those new, or returning, to mirrorless cameras. It’s a lot cheaper, and with an OIS lens in tow you are still going to be able to capture similar images with either.
Mind you, if you can live without a viewfinder and shoot a fair amount of video, then the X-M5 is an even better pick than the X-T30 III, and it costs less.
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/32KsNKK5iLE4uFG9m8ZPQi-2000-80.png
Source link
