Scott Galloway on why Anthropic’s Super Bowl ad got to Sam Altman and showed therapy as AI’s use case

During a recent segment of the Prof G Markets podcast with cohost Ed Elson, Galloway said that what Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei understands—and what makes this ad so vicious and so effective—is that while corporations discuss AI as a productivity enhancer, the reality of user behavior is far more intimate.

The top use case for AI is, in fact, “therapy,” according to Galloway, and “people are revealing their most intimate questions and concerns to AI.” (That is the setup for the Anthropic commercial.)

Jess Ramos, founder of Big Data Energy Analytics, declared on LinkedIn that it was the most thought-provoking Super Bowl ad of the year and that it “obliterated ChatGPT” by poking fun at how many people use it for therapy and validation. Then it “ended with a smackdown of what they think ads will look like in ChatGPT: abruptly interrupted conversation with insensitive ad placements.”

Introducing ads in the middle of a therapy session creates a dystopian scenario that Anthropic is smart to exploit, Galloway said. If a user confesses to an AI that they are suffering from depression, the trust is broken if the platform immediately pivots to monetization.

“The thought that this person is going to take all your personal information and start saying, ‘Oh, you seem to be suffering from depression. Have you thought about Lexapro?’” is a major vulnerability for OpenAI, he added.

Other analysts have praised the ad’s impact, with Australian marketing journalist Mark Ritson dubbing the campaign as “the first piece of effective brand strategy the AI category has produced.”

Echoes of Apple’s legendary ‘1984’ Super Bowl ad

By drawing a hard line in the sand—promising no ads—Anthropic has executed a classic brand strategy, Galloway said.

Because OpenAI has already signaled a move toward ad-supported models to meet growth projections, he explained, it cannot easily refute Anthropic’s privacy-focused stance.

The effectiveness of the attack was made evident by the response from OpenAI’s Altman. Following the ad’s release, he posted a long critique on social media, calling the commercial “dishonest” and “deceptive.”

“Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them,” Altman wrote. “We are not stupid, and we know our users would reject that.”

Galloway characterized Altman’s reaction as a significant misstep, saying, “When you’re the market leader … you don’t reference the competition.” He pointed out that Hertz never referenced Avis, and Coke never referenced Pepsi. By writing an essay-length rebuttal rather than simply dismissing the ad with a compliment, Altman inadvertently validated Anthropic as a serious threat. “He just comes across as defensive,” Galloway observed.

He compared the commercial to Apple’s legendary “1984” Super Bowl ad, which positioned the Mac against the “Big Brother” of IBM. (Considered perhaps the best Super Bowl commercial of all time, the riff on the classic George Orwell novel was named “Commercial of the Decade” by Advertising Age at the end of the 1980s, and was inducted into the Clio Awards Hall of Fame in 1995.) Just as Apple framed IBM as an authoritarian controller of information, Anthropic was positioning OpenAI as a data-harvesting entity that will “prostitute [its users] to advertisers.”