Why you can trust TechRadar
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Aura Ink: review
Aura makes stunning digital photo frames. The Aura Walden, for example, currently sits atop a sideboard in my home with its sleek frame, slick mount and punchy 15-inch display — and it also sits atop our list of the best digital photo frames.
So when Aura unveils an entirely new frame with a display that’s unlike any other I’ve tested, naturally it has my attention. Said frame is the Aura Ink.
The Ink features an energy-efficient 13.3-inch color E Ink display, for a print-like rendering of your images. Unlike other LCD digital frames, the Ink is Calm Tech Certified — consider it a digital detox thanks to its natural, muted display.
Its E Ink Spectra™ 6 display can render millions of colors, but look closely and detail is dotty, despite its 1600 x 1200 resolution and 150ppi density. The Ink lacks the vibrancy and clarity of Aura’s other LCD digital frames, such as the Walden and Aura Aspen, or Lexar’s Pexar and Starlight, but it does work well in bright interiors, especially for artworks and minimalist photography rather than detail-rich photos. Ultimately, it’s much closer to the look of printed photos.
Image 1 of 5
What’s disappointing, however, is that Aura has kitted the Ink out with a somewhat glossy-finish panel, which can suffer from glare. I suspect it’s no worse than the Walden and Aspen frames, but those LCD displays are illuminated, and as such they’re significantly punchier.
Given that the Ink reflects light rather than emits it (like LCD does), it is, in reality, a niche frame. It needs the right conditions — well-lit rooms, but not too sunny — to shine, where it’s probably my new favorite digital frame. If I had to choose between the Ink and Walden frames, though — and I’ve observed both side by side — it’s the latter that gets my vote for display versatility, even if it’s yet another digital display to look at.
That said, the Aura Ink has super-low power consumption and a run time of around three months without a continuous power supply. No cables are needed, just a quarterly charge (assuming you only change the displayed image once per day).
Image 1 of 4
Eliminating the reliance on ugly trailing cables is a design win. With regular LCD digital frames, cables are a necessary evil, and tricky to hide when mounting the frame on a wall, though they are less of an issue if you’re resting the frame on a surface.
I’ve come across one or two frames which are supplied with a white cable instead of a black one, including the Walden, which goes some way in disguising the cable (assuming your walls are licked with a light shade of paint). But there’s no doubt that a no-cable-at-all setup is the dream option.
Like the Walden, the Ink’s display is housed in an attractive frame with a sleek bezel and a 1.5-inch mount (the off-white border between the bezel and the image). It also features a variety of mounting options, being positionable to display images in landscape and portrait format whether the frame sits on a table, bookshelf or other surfaces, or is fixed to a wall.
Aura has made the Ink impressively slimline — it measures just 0.6 inches deep, compared to the around one-inch depth of most other frames I’ve tested.
Image 1 of 8
It charges via USB-C, and the port is easily accessible, which is not something I can say for the Walden’s fiddly power input. The USB-C port is for charging only, however — you can’t connect devices to add images.
Nor does the Ink have a memory card slot — all image uploads are via the companion app. And it displays photos only; there’s no sound. All told, the Ink is as stripped-back as digital frames come.
The Ink shares the same companion app as all Aura frames, which delivers one of the best user experiences in the market and works seamlessly for wireless uploads and display updates, from anywhere with an internet connection.
Image 1 of 5
Updating the displayed image on the Ink is an odd experience if you happen to be looking at the frame at the time. The frame flashes rapidly for the best part of a minute while the pixels of the existing image clear and are refreshed with the new one.
The Ink is limited to a maximum of four image changes per day. This is not Google Photos in a frame, where you might gather around with family, enjoying a rolling image gallery of holiday snaps, but one where you choose your image and live with it for the day or longer.
Image 1 of 6
The real sting in the tail is how much the Aura Ink costs: $499 (pricing and availability for other regions is yet to be confirmed). You really are paying a premium for the E Ink display; even Aura’s larger 15-inch LCD digital photo frames cost much less.
I’ve had the Ink frame in my home for several months, and I’m still somewhat undecided. I think it’s the better frame to place on a wall than an LCD type, especially in a bright interior, where it’s unbeatable. It’s undeniably a premium product, and probably worth paying extra for, especially if you’re weary of excessive screen time. However, LCD frames are more versatile.
Aura Ink: price & release date
Aura unveiled the Ink frame in October 2025 and it’s available in one display size (13.3-inches) for $499. Months later, at the time of writing, it’s still not directly available in other regions outside of the US. I’ve seen this release timeline before with other Aura frames which typically get global availability approximately 6 months later – hopefully the same will be true for the Ink.
I’ve mentioned the Walden frame a few times, which is a larger 15-inch LCD frame but with a much lower price tag, costing around 40% less. Put simply, you’re paying a big premium for the Ink’s E Ink-type display.
Aura Ink: specs
|
Dimensions |
14.1 x 11.4 x 0.6 inches (287 x 206 x 25mm) |
|
Display size |
13.3-inch |
|
Resolution |
1600 x 1200 (150 pixels per inch) |
|
Aspect Ratio |
16:10 |
|
Touch Screen |
No |
|
Sound |
No (no video) |
|
Orientation |
Portrait or landscape |
|
Storage |
N/A |
|
Connectivity |
Wi-Fi (but no SD card, and USB for charging only) |
Should I buy the Aura Ink?
|
Attributes |
Notes |
Rating |
|---|---|---|
|
Features |
No local storage, video or sound, and limited connectivity |
3/5 |
|
Design |
Sleek frame, slim profile, innovative display |
4.5/5 |
|
Performance |
Niche, natural and ‘dotty’ display, slow and limited image refreshes |
4/5 |
|
Value |
It’s almost twice the price of 15-inch LCD frames |
3/5 |
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
Aura Ink: also consider
| Header Cell – Column 0 |
Aura Ink |
Aura Walden |
Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Display size |
13.3-inch |
15-inch |
11-inch |
|
Resolution |
1600 x 1200, 149.5 pixels per inch |
1600 x 1200, 133 pixels per inch |
2000 x 1200, 212 pixels per inch |
|
Aspect Ratio |
16:10 |
16:10 |
5:3 |
|
Touch Screen |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Sound |
No |
Built-in speaker |
Built-in speaker |
|
Orientation |
Portrait or landscape |
Portrait or landscape |
Portrait or landscape |
|
Storage |
N/A |
32GB |
32GB |
|
Connectivity |
Wi-Fi, USB-C (charging only), no SD card slot |
Wi-Fi, USB, SD card slot |
Wi-Fi, SD card slot, USB-A, USB-C |
How I tested the Aura Ink
- I tested the Aura Ink over several months
- I uploaded a limited selection of photos from my Android phone
- I placed the frame on various surfaces around my home, in vertical and horizontal formats
Aura sent me its Ink frame and I set it up in my home months before writing this review. Unlike other reviews published soon after the Ink’s release, I’ve actually tested its long battery life – and yes, the 3-month battery life based on no more than a single image change per day is accurate.
I’ve placed the Ink on a sideboard close to a window, in a dim corner of my front room, and various other spaces around the house.
I’ve uploaded a variety of photos to the frame through Aura’s companion app for Android – both minimalist and detail rich images, in vertical and horizontal formats.
I already have the Aura Walden in my home, so I have been able to make direct comparisons between the two frames.
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mRFNnzBS3jzd6M4Ub6AQX7-1920-80.jpg
Source link
