‘Generative AI just allowed the scammers to create this stuff at crazy scale’: Qobuz’s Managing Director on the AI slop infestation, and why he still refuses to call AI-generated tracks music


AV Insider

On the Record is a new series of interviews and explainers with influential voices in the music industry. From artists to execs, to those behind audio technology we love, we aim to bring you a fresh, focused perspective on sound. Music to your ears? Make sure you follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source.

Things music-lovers enjoy about Qobuz: it was the original hi-res music streaming service and it also offers 24-bit hi-res downloads on demand (ie., no need to subscribe to buy) alongside a regular streaming model. Then, there’s the digital Qobuz Magazine, human-first playlists over algorithms, a more ethical payment at significantly higher average per-stream royalties than mainstream competitors, the fact that it refuses to run a free ad-supported tier that devalues music, it continues to transparently publish its financial payout data, it recently added in-track lyrics… I could go on.

But I’m not here to talk to Managing Editor Dan Mackta about any of those aspects of Qobuz today, admirable though they are. No, I want to talk to him about generative AI, and Qobuz’s strong stance on it, as set out in its February-release AI charter.

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/DvwYL3NzLWi7s9pTkzQ94E-2000-80.jpg



Source link
becky.scarrott@futurenet.com (Becky Scarrott)

Latest articles

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_imgspot_img