Trump claims America is ‘winning so much.’ The IMF agrees, adding that Trump’s trade policies are the only thing holding it back from even more

In his State of the Union address this week, Trump said the U.S. was “winning again, and in fact, we’re winning so much that we really don’t know what to do about it.” Despite suffering from low approval ratings, Trump might soon score points for the economy, courtesy of the International Monetary Fund, which this week highlighted how the U.S. remains in many ways an economic powerhouse. 

Strong economic growth, rising productivity, and a labor market that has proven adaptable and resilient combine to paint a rosy picture of the U.S. economy, according to Kristalina Georgieva, the IMF’s managing director.

“We expect that a buoyant U.S. economy will continue to grow strongly throughout this and next year,” Georgieva said on Wednesday, shortly after her agency had released its annual review and outlook for the U.S. economy.

Georgieva lauded the “remarkable performance” of the U.S. private sector over the past year. GDP growth reached 2.2% in 2025, and the IMF projects it to accelerate to 2.4% for this year. This resilience has turned the U.S. into a primary economic driver for the world that is creating “positive spillovers to the global economy” at a time of high international uncertainty, she added. 

A strong economy could be the country’s best chance to patch up its growing deficit, Georgieva said. But, at least according to the IMF’s recommendations, Trump’s love for punitive tariffs as a main driving force in his trade policy might be actively working against reaching a balanced budget.

The deteriorating state of the country’s fiscal balance threatens to extinguish the benefits of America’s strong economy. Under current policies, general government debt—the measure of how much more the country is spending than taking in—could hit 140% of GDP in the next five years, according to the IMF, possibly more than $50 trillion. The agency noted a troubling paradox in recent policy shifts. While tax and spending changes legislated mostly through the Trump Administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year are expected to modestly boost economic activity this year and next, they’ll be overshadowed by increased spending and lower tax revenue that continue to push federal debt higher.

Trump has framed his tariffs as a key measure to bring in more revenue and reduce the deficit, but Georgieva implicitly pushed back against that narrative. She called U.S. tariffs a “headwind to even stronger growth” that dragged down productivity. In the story of a strong U.S. economy, “we could have seen more of the good news” without the penalizing effect of tariffs, she said.

Other groups hold a more discerning view of the nation’s economic prosperity. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which has frequently sparred with Trump and his officials over the debt trajectory, likened the GDP bump to an “economic sugar high.” A short-term stimulus boost would quickly be followed by a widening deficit and higher interest payments, the CRFB said, warning this burden would override the government’s ability to allocate spending elsewhere.

Right now, “the U.S. is in a position to fund its spending,” Georgieva said. “This is also good for the world as a whole because a U.S. that grows, has high productivity, grows rapidly, and has the ability to create more opportunities for others has a positive spillover effect for the rest of the world.”  

“This being said, please be careful. Look at the deficit and debt levels. Bring them down,” she added.

For the U.S. to maintain its prosperity without digging itself into an even deeper fiscal hole, the IMF expressed support for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s long-stated goal of lowering the federal deficit to 3% of GDP, a target shared by the CRFB and several private sector figures including billionaire investor Ray Dalio. 

But getting there won’t be easy. The IMF calculated the deficit to be 5.9% of GDP last year, and argued that lowering it to that target would require significant spending cuts and increases in government revenues. Much of the IMF’s policy prescription went against the Trump Administration’s stated agenda of sweeping tariffs and reduced immigration flows. The agency recommended replacing tariffs with a destination-based consumption tax similar to VAT—a type of tax borne by consumers that tends to have a neutral impact on trade—a significant restructuring of expensive programs including Medicare and Social Security; and implementing a skills-based immigration system to keep the labor market competitive.

As difficult as those changes might be, for this administration or any other, chipping away at the deficit will only become more difficult as time goes on, Georgieva said, adding that the ideal moment would be now, while the economy is still humming along relatively strongly.

“The U.S. economy continues to deliver an impressive performance,” she said. “This good news provides an important opportunity for the administration to address the long-standing fiscal imbalance.”