SAIL Q4 Results: Cons PAT surges 47% YoY to Rs 1,835 crore, revenue rises 5%

Steel Authority of India (SAIL) reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 1,835 crore in the March-ended quarter versus Rs 1,251 crore in the year ago period, a 47% YoY growth. The profit after tax (PAT) is attributable to the owners of the parent.

The state-run company posted a revenue growth of 5% to Rs 30,813 crore in Q4FY26 versus Rs 29,316 crore posted in the corresponding quarter of the previous financial year.

The company’s bottom line surged by a whopping 391% on a sequential basis versus Rs 374 crore in Q3FY26 while the topline grew 13% quarter-on-quarter versus Rs 27,371 crore posted in the October-December quarter of FY26.

The company’s board also recommended a final dividend of Rs 2.35 per equity share for the financial year 2025-26. The final dividend for FY26 will be paid within 30 days from the date of approval by the shareholders in the upcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM).

On the standalone basis, the PAT stood at Rs 1,680 crore versus Rs 1,178 crore, up 43% YoY while sales in the quarter under review, stood at Rs 30,541 crore versus Rs 29,121 crore, rising by 5%.

The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) stood at Rs 4,762 core versus Rs 3,781 core in the year ago period. It stood at Rs 2,630 crore in Q3FY26.

For full financial year, the standalone PAT stood at Rs 3,233 crore in FY26 versus Rs 2,148 crore in FY25 while sales turnover in the same period stood at Rs 1,09,966 crore in the same period compared to Rs 1,01,716 crore in FY25. On the crude steel production outlook, the company said that steel production has been coming down every year barring 2023 where marginal increase was witnessed. The first 3 months of the current year have also seen the production falling by 2.3 over CPLY with China registering degrowth of 4.6% despite marginal increase in production in Rest of the World (RoW).

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)