Agentic AI is everywhere in cybersecurity right now, but it often feels like everyone is using the term slightly differently.
Vendors are quick to mention it, yet rarely stop to explain what it actually means in practice or what problem it’s meant to solve.
For security leaders, that makes it a difficult space to navigate, especially when expectations are high but clarity is still catching up.
Vice President, Innovation and Emerging Tech, Forescout.
At its core, agentic AI describes a goal-oriented system of multiple agents that can act, sometimes autonomously, towards an outcome. That is a concept, not a cybersecurity result.
In software development, the value is more straightforward. Multiple agents can collaborate to write, test, and improve code. In cybersecurity, the environment is far more fragmented.
Tools span endpoint, network, identity, cloud, vulnerability management, and response. If agentic AI is limited to a single vendor’s ecosystem, it cannot deliver meaningful outcomes. It simply operates within another silo.
The Challenge of Fragmented Security Environments
The cybersecurity industry has long talked about platformization, but in practice many platforms have become larger collections of disconnected capabilities. This is where many early implementations fall short.
Instead of transforming workflows, they provide a chat interface that allows operators to query multiple systems. While this may improve usability, it actually increases cognitive load.
Security teams need to know what the platform is capable of, ask the right questions, interpret results, correlate findings, and decide on actions.
Why Caution Is Justified
Security leaders are right to approach agentic AI carefully. The market is full of bold claims about autonomous systems that can solve complex problems without human input. In reality, most of these systems are far from that level of capability.
Without expert level instruction, agentic systems cannot operate autonomously in a reliable way. Many current solutions depend on users crafting prompts and interpreting outputs.
Transparency is another concern. If a vendor cannot clearly explain how their system works, what data it uses, and where human oversight applies, it is difficult to trust the outcomes. In security operations, where decisions can have direct business impact, that lack of clarity is unacceptable.
The Role of Guardrails and Human Oversight
Effective agentic AI in cybersecurity must include strong guardrails and human-in-the-loop control. Security teams can use AI to accelerate investigation, analysis, and prioritization, but final decisions must remain with people.
Actions need to be explainable, traceable, and auditable. Security leaders must be able to understand why a recommendation was made and what evidence supports it. Without that, trust quickly breaks down.
The goal is not to remove humans from the process, but to give them better information faster and reduce the number of manual steps required to reach a decision.
Planning Past the Hype Cycle
The industry is already moving beyond early experimentation. Agentic workflows are beginning to reshape how security operations function. In some cases, they will reduce the need for traditional orchestration approaches as intelligence becomes embedded directly in investigation and response.
At the same time, new models, like Mythos, are emerging that can assess vulnerabilities and provide deeper insight into risk. These developments will challenge tools that rely heavily on static analysis or periodic assessments.
Mythos has transformed the vulnerability detection space and we’re starting to see disruptive volumes of findings. But, what happens 12 months from now after the number of findings plateau? How will your agentic tools detect misconfiguration or poor posture and take remediation action for those vulnerabilities that did not get patched?
That’s where the real test begins. Agentic AI offering lasting value should move beyond discovering issues to continuously identifying root causes, detecting drift in posture or configuration, and guiding remediation over time.
What Good Looks Like in Practice
When implemented correctly, agentic AI can deliver meaningful benefits. Consider a ransomware incident. Instead of requiring an analyst to manually investigate across multiple tools, an agentic system could connect events across endpoint, network, and identity data.
It could identify that malware execution is linked to a disabled protection control, trace lateral movement attempts, and highlight indicators of compromise. All of this information can be presented as a clear, evidence based narrative.
Rather than sorting through alerts, the analyst is given a concise understanding of what happened, why it matters, and what actions can be taken. This might include isolating affected systems or restricting access to contain the threat.
Reducing Noise and Improving Decision Making
One of the biggest challenges in security operations is the volume of alerts. Agentic AI has the potential to improve the signal to noise ratio by correlating data and focusing attention on what truly matters.
By combining evidence from multiple sources, it can escalate only the most critical issues and provide clear reasoning behind those decisions. This allows teams to respond more quickly and with greater confidence.
Today, many investigations take hours or even days. By automating key steps, agentic AI can reduce that time significantly, helping teams keep pace with fast moving threats while reducing burnout.
What to Prioritize
Security leaders need to separate marketing claims from real capability. Many vendors promote AI, but few are using it to fundamentally improve how security work is done. The focus should be on solutions that reduce detection and response time and improve operational efficiency.
Strong solutions are grounded in real data. They rely on tools that directly observe activity across endpoint, network, identity, and cloud environments. This data provides the foundation for accurate analysis and decision making.
Equally important is the ability to take action. Systems that only generate alerts or tickets add friction. The most valuable platforms enable teams to act within the same workflow, whether that means isolating devices, enforcing policies, or guiding response actions.
A Practical Path Forward
Not all consolidation is beneficial. Security teams should avoid solutions that add noise without improving clarity.
They should also be cautious of systems that rely heavily on open ended prompts. These interfaces often shift the burden onto the user, forcing them to determine what questions to ask and whether the system can answer them.
Security leaders should avoid AI that produces unreliable or unsupported outputs. Effective agentic AI must be grounded in repeatable workflows and supported by verifiable evidence.
Agentic AI has potential to improve cybersecurity operations, but only when it is applied thoughtfully. The goal is not full automation, but meaningful augmentation of human expertise.
CISOs should adopt a measured approach. Invest in solutions that provide clear value today, maintain governance and oversight, and build toward greater capability over time. By focusing on outcomes rather than hype, security leaders can take advantage of agentic AI without introducing unnecessary risk.
Success will come from using AI to make security teams faster, more informed, and more effective while keeping humans firmly in control of decisions that matter most.
We rank the best identity management software.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/pVCXKrhThqmUjYVSZBjV5Z-2560-80.jpg
Source link
